🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor constantly bore the weight of her parent’s reputation. As the offspring of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, among the best-known English artists of the 1900s, her name was enveloped in the deep shadows of the past.

An Inaugural Recording

Earlier this year, I contemplated these legacies as I prepared to produce the world premiere recording of her piano concerto from 1936. With its intense musical themes, heartfelt tunes, and bold rhythms, Avril’s work will provide music lovers fascinating insight into how this artist – a wartime composer born in 1903 – imagined her reality as a woman of colour.

Past and Present

However about legacies. It requires time to adjust, to recognize outlines as they truly exist, to distinguish truth from misinterpretation, and I was reluctant to face her history for a period.

I had so wanted Avril to be a reflection of her father. In some ways, she was. The idyllic English tones of parental inspiration can be observed in several pieces, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only look at the titles of her father’s compositions to realize how he identified as not only a champion of UK romantic tradition and also a voice of the African diaspora.

At this point Samuel and Avril seemed to diverge.

White America assessed the composer by the mastery of his music rather than the colour of his skin.

Family Background

As a student at the prestigious music college, the composer – the offspring of a African father and a white English mother – turned toward his African roots. When the Black American writer the renowned Dunbar arrived in England in the late 19th century, the aspiring artist was keen to meet him. He adapted the poet’s African Romances to music and the following year adapted his verses for a stage piece, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral work that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Inspired by the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an worldwide sensation, particularly among the Black community who felt vicarious pride as the majority judged Samuel by the quality of his art rather than the his race.

Principles and Actions

Fame failed to diminish his activism. During that period, he was present at the initial Pan African gathering in the UK where he encountered the prominent scholar this influential figure and saw a variety of discussions, covering the mistreatment of the Black community there. He was an activist until the end. He maintained ties with trailblazers for equality like this intellectual and this leader, delivered his own speeches on equality for all, and even talked about issues of racism with President Theodore Roosevelt on a trip to the presidential residence in the early 1900s. In terms of his art, reminisced Du Bois, “he wrote his name so high as a musician that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He died in that year, at 37 years old. Yet how might the composer have made of his child’s choice to travel to this country in the that decade?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Offspring of Renowned Musician gives OK to apartheid system,” ran a headline in the Black American publication Jet magazine. The system “appeared to me the right policy”, the composer stated Jet. Upon further questioning, she revised her statement: she was not in favor with this policy “in principle” and it “ought to be permitted to work itself out, overseen by benevolent residents of all races”. Had Avril been more attuned to her family’s principles, or born in segregated America, she could have hesitated about this system. But life had shielded her.

Identity and Naivety

“I possess a UK passport,” she remarked, “and the authorities failed to question me about my ethnicity.” Therefore, with her “porcelain-white” complexion (as Jet put it), she moved among the Europeans, lifted by their praise for her renowned family member. She gave a talk about her family’s work at the educational institution and led the broadcasting ensemble in that location, programming the heroic third movement of her composition, subtitled: “In memory of my Father.” Although a confident pianist on her own, she never played as the soloist in her piece. On the contrary, she consistently conducted as the maestro; and so the apartheid orchestra performed under her direction.

Avril hoped, as she stated, she “may foster a transformation”. But by 1954, circumstances deteriorated. Once officials learned of her Black ancestry, she could no longer stay the country. Her citizenship failed to safeguard her, the diplomatic official recommended her departure or face arrest. She returned to England, embarrassed as the scale of her innocence became clear. “The lesson was a difficult one,” she lamented. Adding to her disgrace was the release in 1955 of her unfortunate magazine feature, a year after her forced leaving from that nation.

A Common Narrative

As I sat with these legacies, I perceived a familiar story. The narrative of identifying as British until it’s challenged – which recalls African-descended soldiers who fought on behalf of the British during the World War II and survived only to be denied their due compensation. And the Windrush generation,