🔗 Share this article

The UN Security Council has adopted a US-backed resolution that supports Morocco's claim regarding the contested Western Sahara, despite significant opposition from neighboring Algeria.

Divided Decision Bolsters Morocco's Stance

Although the recent vote was divided, the measure constitutes the strongest support to date for Morocco's proposal to retain sovereignty over the territory, which additionally enjoys support from the majority of EU countries and a growing number of African nation allies.

Resolution Structure and Important Components

The document describes Morocco's proposal as a basis for talks. As with previous resolutions, the document makes no mention of a vote on self-determination that contains independence as an choice, which represents the solution traditionally supported by the independence-seeking Polisario movement and its allies.

Real autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty could constitute a most feasible resolution.

Historical Context

The territory is a mineral-rich stretch of coastal arid land the area of Colorado which was under Spain's control until 1975. It is claimed by both the Moroccan government and the Polisario Front, which functions from temporary settlements in southwestern neighboring Algeria and asserts to represent the Sahrawi people indigenous to the disputed territory.

Decision Results and International Reactions

The United States, which proposed the resolution, led eleven countries in voting in favor, while 3 countries – multiple nations – abstained. The neighboring country, the movement's main benefactor, did not participate.

Mike Waltz, the American ambassador to the UN, stated the decision had been "historic" and would "build on the momentum for a much-delayed peace in the region".

Amar Bendjama, the Algerian representative to the UN, said that while the resolution was an improvement on earlier iterations, it "contains a series of deficiencies".

Security Mission and Upcoming Assessment

The resolution also extends the UN peacekeeping operation in the territory for an additional twelve months, as has been done for over thirty years. Prior extensions, however, have not included a mention to Moroccan and its supporters' favored outcome.

The measure urges all parties involved to "take this unique opportunity for a lasting resolution." Depending on developments, it asks the UN leader to assess the operation's authority within six months.

Area Consequences and Current Situation

The change could unsettle a protracted process that for decades has eluded settlement, notwithstanding a UN peacekeeping mission that was designed to be short-term. Protests have ensued in indigenous refugee camps in Algeria this recent period, where residents have pledged not to give up their struggle for self-determination.

The Moroccan government controls almost all of the territory, except for a thin area known as the "liberated area" that lies to the east of a Moroccan-built sand wall.

Historical Context and Current Events

A 1991 ceasefire was meant to facilitate a vote on self-determination, but disagreements over voter eligibility blocked it from occurring.

Through time, Morocco has transformed the disputed territory, constructing a deepwater port and a long highway. Government subsidies keep food and energy costs affordable, and the population has grown significantly as Moroccans settle in cities such as Dakhla and Laayoune.

The movement ended the truce in 2020 after confrontations near a road the government was constructing to Mauritania.

The group has since regularly reported military activity, while the government has primarily denied active fighting. The United Nations calls it "low-level tensions".

Global Diplomacy and Coming Possibilities

In response to the draft resolution, Polisario stated that it would not participate in any process aiming "to validate Morocco's unauthorized presence," saying resolution "can never be achieved by supporting expansionism".

The conflict represents the driving force in north African diplomacy. Morocco considers support for its proposal as a benchmark for how it gauges its international partners.

Last October, the UN representative suggested dividing the territory, a suggestion no party agreed to. He encouraged the government to specify what self-rule would entail and warned that a lack of development might raise questions about the United Nations' role and "whether there is space and willingness for us to still be useful."

The initiative to review the UN operation comes as the US slashes funding for United Nations initiatives and agencies, including peacekeeping.